Aggi engagements come in four shapes. Assess, Architect, and Respond are project-based — bounded scope, defined deliverable, clear exit. Lead is embedded — fractional-CTO leadership for AI-security and AI-governance teams that need experienced judgment in the room, on the calendar, not just on a quarterly report. Every mode is led by senior practitioners. No bait-and-switch to junior consultants. No bloated team plans.
All four modes share the same underlying logic: signals come in, they get contextualized against your operating frameworks, and what comes out is defensible action. What changes between modes is the scope, the duration, and how embedded we are in your team's daily decisions.
Posture assessments that map your AI deployment against the responsibility framework — finding the gaps, scoring the risk, and prioritizing remediation that matches your regulatory exposure. The kind of report you can hand to a board, an enterprise buyer in procurement, or a regulator without flinching.
Security-by-design across the AI/ML lifecycle. Adversarial defense, guardrail architecture, governance instrumentation, audit-trail engineering — built into your systems from the spec, not bolted on after a breach. We work alongside your engineering and security leads to design what good looks like, then help you actually ship it.
When an AI system misbehaves — a bias incident, a drift breach, a regulatory inquiry, a procurement-blocking finding from an enterprise customer — we engage with your CISO, compliance officer, and engineering leadership simultaneously. Decision-ready, defensible, fast. The deliverable is not a report; the deliverable is the situation being contained and a path forward that holds up.
Embedded leadership for AI-security and AI-governance teams that need experienced judgment without a full-time hire. Fractional-CTO engagements where Dr. Golla sits inside your leadership cadence — your weekly architecture reviews, your security council, your board prep, your hiring decisions for the AI-security team you're building. Not a deliverable. A seat.
Every Aggi engagement — whether it's ARIA running continuously inside your infrastructure or Dr. Golla sitting in your weekly architecture review — turns the same kind of input into the same kind of output. Signals come in (drift telemetry, audit alerts, behavioral test results, vendor-procurement findings, regulator letters); they get contextualized against the frameworks you operate under (NIST AI RMF, HIPAA, FDA CDS, ISO 42001, EU AI Act, HITRUST CSF); and the output is defensible action — fast enough to keep operations running, structured enough to survive an audit. Inside ARIA, that decision layer is ControlMesh, running at platform scale. In a consulting engagement, the decision layer is Dr. Golla and the senior practitioner he assigns. Same logic. Same standard. Pick the scale that fits.
"Fractional CTO" gets used loosely in the market. Here's what it means at Aggi specifically — what's in scope, what's out, and when it's the right call versus when a project-based engagement would serve you better.
Project-based engagements (Assess, Architect, Respond) work when you have a defined question, a defined timeline, and a team capable of executing on the output. Fractional CTO works when the question keeps changing, the timeline is "ongoing," and the team itself is still being built or restructured.
The honest version: Lead engagements work because we say no to the ones where they wouldn't. If a project-based mode would serve you better, that's what we'll propose.
Aggi sells two things, and we keep them straight because mixing them up is how clients end up paying for things they don't need. ARIA is software; you (or we) operate it. The practice is people; we engage with you directly. Both exist because both kinds of work are real. Most clients use one or the other. Some use both.
When you want continuous monitoring of an AI system you're operating — drift detection, behavioral testing, audit-ready evidence, the full 180-day activity record. The decision layer is ControlMesh, running 24/7 against your AI.
When you want senior practitioners in the room — for a bounded project (Assess/Architect/Respond) or as embedded leadership (Lead). The decision layer is Dr. Golla and the team he assigns, working alongside yours.
Most clients start with one and add the other when the need shows up. We don't try to talk you into the second. We'll tell you which one to start with.
Tell us about the situation in a sentence or two. We'll tell you honestly which mode (if any) fits, and whether a different shape of help would serve you better.
Get in Touch → About Dr. Golla